Search found 266 matches
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:38 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
I wanted to decimate the defence by suggesting an expensive player who wasn’t getting game time potentially being moved on to make way for someone the new manager may want. Ok, how am I decimating the defence Kier? Kitching wasn’t even playing 😂 I’ve supported him since he started. You haven’t made...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:36 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:35 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
I also attend matches and support the team but gave the manager a chance unlike yourself. I’m going to assume that wasn’t intended as a dig. I didn’t say “Lampard has solved football for all time”. Where did I say this or words similar? I’ve been pushing for him to get further support with new play...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:55 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
I also attend matches and support the team but gave the manager a chance unlike yourself. I’m going to assume that wasn’t intended as a dig. I didn’t say “Lampard has solved football for all time”. Where did I say this or words similar? I’ve been pushing for him to get further support with new play...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:25 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
What price was that then? I mentioned that his value would depreciate window by window if he wasn’t playing regularly which is obvious it would. If managers continued to omit him then moving him on would be a no brainer but Lampard has included him and he’s playing well. Notice you’ve given up on t...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:50 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
I didn’t say it was supporting Lampard. Not sure where you got that from. Kitching was out of favour for over half of this season under 3 managers. The defence was awful and he couldnt get a look in. Blackburn saw an out of favour player and wanted to take him on loan but it was rightly rejected, s...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:14 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
I didn’t say it was supporting Lampard. Not sure where you got that from. Kitching was out of favour for over half of this season under 3 managers. The defence was awful and he couldnt get a look in. Blackburn saw an out of favour player and wanted to take him on loan but it was rightly rejected, s...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:08 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
Kitching is our best defender but he was out of favour for several months under 3 managers. If that continued to remain the case then his value would depreciate window by window and it would then make sense to sell him. Thankfully he’s back in the team and is a massive reason for the clean sheets a...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:30 am
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
Believe Emc & Grimes (obviously) will be ready for this. It’s a great game to have quality reinforcements. The deck will need seriously freshening up at this point. Lampard is working with 15-16 proven (Dasilva?) outfield players. Some on here did not want him backed this window (why?) Of cours...
- Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:19 am
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
- Replies: 38
- Views: 413
Re: V Swansea (A) - 01/02/25
He was lost on the touchline without AV. The new coaching team that he employed was a joke I guess. We're second in the form table over the last 12 games now. Pretty incredible work by Lampard and his staff. I'm going to focus on them. Imagine if we beat Leeds. What a statement that would be. Belie...